TSTP Solution File: ALG269^4 by Nitpick---2016

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : ALG269^4 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n086.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 11:28:40 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 25.55s
% Output   : FiniteModel 25.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG269^4 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n086.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 15:37:33 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 25.55/10.14  Nitpicking formula...
% 25.55/10.14  Timestamp: 15:37:42
% 25.55/10.14  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 25.55/10.14  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 25.55/10.14  Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent
% 25.55/10.14  this.)
% 25.55/10.14  Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 25.55/10.14    card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 1
% 25.55/10.14    card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 2
% 25.55/10.14    card bnd_term = 2 and card bnd_subst = 1
% 25.55/10.14    card bnd_term = 2 and card bnd_subst = 2
% 25.55/10.14    card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 3
% 25.55/10.14  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 25.55/10.14  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_term = 2 and card bnd_subst = 1:
% 25.55/10.14  
% 25.55/10.14    Constants:
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_ap =
% 25.55/10.14        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.55/10.14        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b1),
% 25.55/10.14         b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b1))
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_comp = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1))
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_hoasinduction_lem3v2a = True
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_hoasinduction_no_psi_cond = False
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_id = b1
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_lam = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b1)
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_one = b2
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_push =
% 25.55/10.14        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.55/10.14        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1), b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1))
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_sh = b1
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_sub =
% 25.55/10.14        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.55/10.14        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1), b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b2))
% 25.55/10.14      bnd_var = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False, b2 := True)
% 25.55/10.14  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 25.55/10.14  Total time: 939 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------